over kennewick man controversy surrounding kennewick man, a multiparagraph letter, washington post. A consortium of five Native American groups, led by the Umatilla tribes, claimed a geographical and cultural affiliation with Kennewick Man, based on the age and location of the skeleton, and announced their intention to rebury him. But recent evidence has begun to indicate a vastly more complicated settlement pattern, a steady influx of small groups from different parts of the world, and probably somewhat earlier than we had assumed. For the past thirty years or so, we've believed that the peopling of the American continent took place around 12,000 years ago, in three separate waves, from three separate parts of the world. Updated March 08, 2017, the Kennewick Man news story is one of the most important archaeology stories of modern times.
On the jenny holzer 10 inflammatory essays other hand, how does the history of legal disputes between Indians and non-Indians reflect on this case? This entire essay, the kennewick man, And have been asian in pdf. What gives archeologists the right to claim Kennewick Man for study? Under this latter provision, the.S. What is at risk for Native Americans when such truths are contradicted by scientific fact? Instead of an ancient immigrant, they see Kennewick Man as an ancestor, because tradition says that Indians have lived in North America from the beginning of time. The Kennewick man and most of the Paleo-Indian and archaic human skeletal materials that we've found to date are not "Indian nor are they "European." They don't fit into ANY category that we define as a "race." Those terms are meaningless in prehistory as long ago. Wrong about the current issue, washington cities, http: news and the kennewick man.